VALIDATE YOURSELF


Never forget that only dead fish swim with the stream,
if you are not dead fish then VALIDATE YOURSELF

Thursday, April 7, 2011

PROCEDER :LAYING OF PAPERS ON THE TABLE BY PRIVATE MEMBERS

LAYING OF PAPERS ON THE TABLE BY PRIVATE MEMBERS


Introduction  Papers are laid on the Table in order to supply authoritative facts and information to the House with a view to enabling members to participate in the debates in a meaningful manner. Papers are laid either in compliance with specific provisions of the Constitution, the various Central statutes and the Rules of Procedure, or in pursuance of the directions issued by the Speaker from time to time or in pursuance of the recommendations of the Parliamentary Committees or the settled practices and conventions in regard thereto. Once a paper is laid on the Table, it becomes permanent record of the House and a public document, open to inspection and use of members.
Scope  Normally, it is the Ministers who on behalf of the Government lay documents on the Table of the House. A private member ie. other than Minister can, however, also lay a paper or document on the Table but only with the previous permission of the Speaker. The member is required to supply a copy of such paper or document to the Speaker in advance to enable him to decide whether permission may be given.

A paper or document sought to be laid on the Table of the House by a private member is considered for laying on the Table only if the member has quoted therefrom and there is demand for laying it on the Table.
Time for giving Notice  : Notice seeking permission of the Speaker to lay a paper or document on the Table of the House, accompanied by the document in question, should be given sufficiently in advance, preferably by 10.00 hours on the day on which the paper is sought to be laid on the Table. If, however, a member, during the course of his speech in the House, without seeking the permission of the Speaker in advance, seeks to lay a paper or document on the Table, even though duly authenticated by him, the same is not automatically treated as paper laid on the Table. The document thus handed over by the member is examined within the parameters of established guidelines on the subject either in the shape of Directions by the Speaker or precedents based on the rulings given by the Chair from time to time.Authentication of Papers sought to be laid
A member who seeks permission to lay a paper or a document on the Table is required to record thereon a certificate in one of the following forms, as the case may be:
(a) I certify from my personal knowledge that this is the original document which is authentic.
(b) I certify from my personal knowledge that this document is a true copy of the original which is authentic.
(c) I certify that the contents of this document are correct and based on the authentic information.
If the paper or document consists of more than one page, the member is required to put his signature with date on every page thereof.
Conditions for admissibility
While according his permission to treat a paper/ document as laid on the Table, the Speaker is guided by the following factors :
(i) that the member had referred to the paper or document in the House, had quoted therefrom and there was a demand for laying the same on the Table;

(ii) that matter contained in the paper or document was in some way connected with business then before the House;

(iii) that the document was important enough to be brought on records of the House;

(iv) that the member was directed by the Chair to lay the paper or document on the Table;
(v) that the document contained facts and was not propagandist in nature;
(vi) that the document contained nothing which was against the wider interest of the nation;
(vii) that by laying document on the Table, the House was not made a forum for expressing views which would lower its prestige or authority;
(viii) that the document was original and authentic;
(ix) that the document had been published by the State or any other competent authority.
Grounds on which permission to lay a paper/ document may not be granted :
(i) that the document was in the nature of private correspondences;
(ii) that the member had cited it merely to reinforce his arguments to which the Minister had already given a reply;
(iii) that there was no demand by the House for its being laid on the Table;
(iv) that the document did not corroborate the statement made by the member;
(v) that the document was a statement of figures prepared by the member or contained his views and the member could not vouch for the authenticity of its contents;
(vi) that the document was not original but merely a copy, the authenticity of which could not be verified;
(vii) that the document was easily available for reference;
(viii) that the member sought to lay the document independent of any relevant business before the House;
(ix) that the member has neither quoted from the document nor had been called upon to lay the same nor there was any question of privilege involved so as to require him to substantiate the allegations made by him with the documentary evidence.
Secret Government Documents
So far as the question of permitting a member to lay on the Table of the House a secret document which he had referred to in the course of his speech is concerned, it is the prerogative of the Speaker to refuse permission if he feels that it would be against the national interest to do so. The decision of the Speaker cannot be questioned. Till the document is permitted to be laid on the Table, any person giving publicity to its contents through any writing or publication in the Press would not be entitled to any protection against action under the law.
Treatment of papers permitted to be laid on the Table of the House
Unlike Ministers, members if permitted by the Speaker are not required formally to stand in the House and lay the paper or document on the Table of the House. Where the Speaker accords his permission to a private member to lay a paper/document on the Table of the House, an authenticated copy thereof is placed in the Parliament Library for reference by members. This fact is indicated in the Lok Sabha Debates and members are also informed through a paragraph in Lok Sabha Bulletin-Part II.
In case a member lays a document on the Table while making a statement and the Chair permits the member to lay the same there and then, the entry about the document laid is made in Bulletin-Part I and no separate para issued in Bulletin-Part II.
When the Speaker does not accord his permission to a member to lay a paper/document on the Table, the same is returned to the member concerned.

[Laying of papers or documents on the Table by a Private Member is governed by Directions 117, 118 and 118A of the Directions by the Speaker.]

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

DOER'S or watcher's

Dear Brethren, Vande maatram !


Very rarely, I do realise the significance to write frequently on a particular issue, until and unless it is of national importance and requires national attention!

Statistics tell us that 85% INDIAN households

Do not buy one non-fiction book in a span of one year . Not one! If that amazes you, here

is something even more amazing. 90% of those who bought a

non-fiction book did not read it! Yet during that period of time

these same people spent BILLION DOLLARS on movies and watched

television over 6 hours a day or 42 hours a week!



Now I can hear you say, "LASTMAN, that's not true in my

household".

Perhaps. But look around and add up how many hours the

TV is running in the background, or you are flipping the remote

"just to see what's on". Compare that to how much reading you do.



Are you addicted to the "plug in drug"? Both men and women are

highly addicted to this powerful drug. Men will often criticize

women for watching TV soap operas or other mindless TV programs,

but they are not immune to this drug either. Watching TV sports is

the most mindless, time wasting non-activity ever conceived by man.

The problem is we have become a nation of "watchers" instead of a

nation of "doers". We watch people entertain, play sports and do

other activities but we rarely participate in these activities

In the life of a nation, sixty four years is a long enough time for introspection and reflection



to take stock,what are our achievements and in which direction are we headed?



Money todayhas become the sole measure of success. We live in a dog-eat-dog world.

Where we are selfishly occupied with our own selves.



Do we care about our culture and nation anymore?



Aren’t we leaving behind apoor legacy?



THESE VERSES WRITTEN BY THE POET IQBAL ISSUED A TIMELY WARNING:



VATAN KI FIKAR KAR NADAN



MUSIBAT AANE WALI HAI



TERI BARBADIYON KE MASHWARE HAIN



AASMANO MEIN



NA SAMJHOGE TO MIT JAOGE,



AEI HINDUSTAN WALO,



TUMHARI DASTAN TAQ BHI



NA HOGI DASTANO MEIN.



if you wanted to actually PLAY a role of initiater/leader

in the ongoing freedom fight against corruption country wide

be a leader in your area where you live take a initiative

On 5th April 2011, under the banner of the people’s movement called India Against Corruption

eminent social reformer Shri Anna Hazare is sitting on Fast unto death to get the Jan Lokpal bill

enacted. This is the real match, where you can play and win and get rid of the guilt, we true lovers of

India, harbor in our hearts. I shall fast on 5th April to show solidarity with the movement. What you

can do:

SPREAD THIS MESSAGE! INVITE ALL TO THIS EVENT, (POST TO YOUR WALLS on Facebook) [Join Anna at Jantar Mantar Event Link- http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=156227681104211]

Join the “India Against Corruption” movement, by giving a missed call to 022 61550789 – We will

sms you a msg from Anna and others, on what you can do today, and every day. Much needs to be

done, to shake up our government and wake them up.



Stay in touch with minute-by-minute progress, join www.facebook.com/IndiaCor



Do anything and everything in your capacity! Our nation needs tens of thousands to join Anna at

Jantar Mantar.

If each one of us does this, and reaches out to all our friends, and ask everyone on our contact list to do the same, we will have a million supporters in the next few days! This can have a tremendous impact. Nationwide, awareness campaigns for the Jan Lokpal Bill and Anna’s Fast announcement are being spread. Thousands are finding innovative ways to spread the word, by running, or biking. Children have pledged to fast on April 5th. Young and old alike are with Anna. We need to stand united at this historic moment in the journey of our nation! At the New Delhi Action Center (and across over 100 cities across India), to support Anna and push for the Jan Lokpal Bill, action is shifting into high gear as every volunteer drives himself or herself to the limit to reach out to all! Leaders, organizations and the common man from across India will be with him.

Across India, join Swami Ramdev, Sri Sri Ravishankar, Swami Agnivesh, Arch Bishop of Delhi Vincent Concessao, Mahmood A Madani, Kiran Bedi, J M Lyngdoh, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal, Mufti Shamoom Qasmi, Mallika Sarabhai, Arun Bhatia, Sunita Godara, All India Bank Employees Federation, PAN IIT Alumni Association, Common Cause, Federation for Restoration of National Values and many other prominent organizations and leaders, as India comes out on the streets! 100+ CITIES WILL RALLY BEHIND ANNA!

Let’s join hand together on 5th April to showcase our unity to the government

REGARDS

Er.LASTMAN OF INDIA

Cosmopolitan

author, visionary thinker, Master Hypnotist,

and Personal Performance Consultant.RTI activist.

City-coordinator

India against corruption [movement by masses]

www.indiaAgainstCorruption.org

FARRUKHABAD U.P

MO: 9453538312

lastmanofindia@gmail.com



p.s: LAST but not least don’t forget to forward this mail to your friends & relatives to play your extremely important role in the ongoing second & ultimate freedom fight against corruption & corrupt

Monday, April 4, 2011

CITIZENS or SUBJECT

Dear fellow country men & women


Vande mataram



INDIAN DEMOCRACY :a genuine case of the blind leading the blind.



We blame the British for their “divide and rule” policy.

Were we not divided even before the British came to India? could they have conquered India

if we were not divided to begin with?

The biggest traitors are our own politicians who play the caste game and weaken the nation, only

to strengthen their own position . they do not realize that if the nation is weak , no matter how

strong they are individually, they will be destroyed.



CITIZENS OR SUBJECT?



I don’t know if there can be anything like feudal democracy.

It seems that there is, therefore, I take a very tolerant view of the

misconduct of our beloved leaders , this is because we live by

the philosophy,



the king can do no wrong,

our political values have plunged so low ,

that it doesn’t take courage to do wrong,

but it takes a lot of courage to do right.



The preamble to the Constitution of India reads as follows.



“ WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a

SOVEREIGN - SOCIALIST – SECULAR - DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

and to secure to all its citizens:

JUSTICE - social, economic and political;

LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;

and to promote among them all

FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;

IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949,

do HEREBY

ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.





All very predictable stuff, really. We have courts, plurality,

some increases in opportunity, etc. Yes, there are glaring deficiencies too,. The preamble merely

assures us that we have a specific intent, and that the Constitution shall provide the means to

attaining it.

Indeed, the first few articles in the Constitution follow quite naturally from the preamble, listing

who we are (citizenship), where we live (territory), our rights and responsibilities, etc. Later, the

Constitution outlines the nature of our government, the various public offices, the powers vested

in the office-holders, and how those powers are shared. To the casual reader, and with the

hindsight of 50+ years, the entire document appears to be a well-reasoned and detailed

framework for government and social organisation, and rightly so. I have no clash with much

of it, and like many others, I find the intent and diligence of the original framers laudable.



But where has this document brought us? Today,



whereas we have maintained the appearance of representative government, with elections galore,

and promises upon promises to eradicate poverty, remove illiteracy and in short order recreate heaven on earth, in fact India boasts the world's largest number of poor people assembled under one government, in history!

Disparities of income have turned the quest for economic utopia into a joke, religious rivalry has rendered

the secular state of harmonious fraternity notional at best, our criminals aspire to legislate and

our worthy seek nothing so much as to remove themselves from Indian public life. More than

half a century since the eloquent imagination of those early days, there is much promised in the

Constitution that is far from reality.



When JOHN KENNEDY asked WERNER VON BRAUN

what it would take to build a rocket that would carry a man to the moon and return him safely to earth ,

his answer was

simple and direct



“ THE WILL TO DO IT”



President never asked back if it was possible and the rest is in the pages of history.



Namely- why would you,

me ,

or anyone,

want [or need] to overcome such challenges of life

which we face every moment of life , give that some real thought because the answer to that

question , has the power to turn your life around in the snap of your fingers.



But we say , the Constitution is only a piece of paper, and no matter that we may inscribe upon it

glorious truths, reality must nonetheless reflect what we have actually done in pursuing them.

The ideals haven't eroded, us reason, it is that those empowered to promote them bear no

resemblance to the visionary men and women of integrity that the framers thought would be at

the helm. Instead, our leaders have been unqualified disasters, placing their self-interest regularly

ahead of any national good.



Always remember



responsibility without authority is meaningless



but



authority without responsibilty is very very dangerous



Perhaps. And yet, by some combination of luck and will, we have arrived at a time when calls to

reconsider the original document are regularly heard. It is true that many of those attempting this

revision have a political agenda, despite the appointment of several non-partisan people to the

commission now in place to suggest a revised edition. Senior justices appointed by different

governments, experts in constitutional law, and socio-economic geniuses alike find some place in

this experiment, and it is likely that not all of them will permit themselves to be swayed by their

political leanings alone.

The issue before us, really, is two-fold.

One, that the original framework

and its practice have not led to the desired outcomes,

and two, that the longer this remains true,

the more political the process of altering the framework will become.





There is, however, a middle path. Along this journey, we may continue to aspire to the goals

originally laid out, and yet reach towards a more cherished end than we have witnessed so far.

Doing so will mean that we must acknowledge that incremental attempts at change have been

easily subverted in the past, and accept that there is no gain from continuing down that road. The

change that is required must be dramatic, it must be significant and it must represent, despite

that, a compromise which a wide spectrum of political opinion will embrace. All of those

objectives are served well by the simplest of procedures, the mere addition of one sentence to the

existing Constitution, or, alternately by the removal of one line from it.

Articles 36 to 51 outline an important part of the framers' vision, which has subsequently been

discarded by the state, either from economic limitation or by deliberate political choice.

Together, these are known as the Directive Principles of State Policy. And the original sin to

which much of today's decay can be traced, as well as the inspiration for moving forward and

away from today's lamentable state, are both ironically contained in the same article (37) within

the Directive Principles, and it runs as follows.

The provisions contained in this Part [ie, Part IV, the Directive Principles] shall not be

enforceable by any court, but the principles therein laid down are nevertheless fundamental in

the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in

making laws.

The dichotomy of that provision is telling. To understand why, one needs only to look at the

directives in these articles, which run the gamut of a good society. The state shall secure a social

order for the promotion of the welfare of the people (38), the state shall guard against

exploitation of the infirm and weak and promote the distribution of material wealth for the

common good (39), the state shall ensure that employment obtains a living wage (43), and that

children are provided free and compulsory education (45), the state shall guard the natural

environment of the territory (48A), etc. The language of the directive principles reads like a

laundry list that a civil liberties union would compose. It is remarkable, then, that these inspiring

objectives should be circumvented by the provision that the state's duty to obtain these ends shall

not be enforceable by law.

Why? How can that which is "fundamental in the governance of the country" be something that

does not merit this sensible protection? What sort of ideal is one that is immediately disavowed

in compromise? The framers, doubtless, had their reasons. And in some of the articles, these

reasons are indicated. The state has limited economic capacities (it costs a lot of money to

educate 300 million children), and certain social norms may require time to muster the needed

political and social capital (the controversial Article 44, urging the state to enact one law for all

citizens, comes to mind). But these limitations aren't in perpetuity, and the framers knew that

only too well. Universal education, for example, was considered do-able in 10 years' time. And

yet, four of ten Indians are illiterate, with over five times this period behind us.

That is unfortunate, but remediable. Although the state (at various levels) has professed inability

to engineer these directive principles, it repeatedly claims to stand by them. Most political parties

find substantive value in the Constitution, and notwithstanding their differences with parts of it,

are reluctant to call for widespread changes, partly from fear that their pet vote-banks may be

eradicated by new social policy. Also, the incremental changes we have sought in legislation

have not promoted the ends so vigorously proclaimed in the directive principles. We've stumbled

along the way, lost the direction we were exhorted to proceed along, and are for various reasons

wary of altering course substantially.

A one-line fix to the Constitution can alter this, changing the ground rules without substantially

modifying the framework of social organization as envisaged in the Constitution. It will require

no controversial commission to study the merits of new laws for months together, will involve no

charge of being particularly motivated by a specific political goal, and to the degree that all

parties place some faith in constitutional government, it will represent a continuity with the past.

Let the Directive Principles of State Policy have the force of law and be enforceable in the

courts.

If necessary, we can debate a suitable time over which this transition needs to take place, and set

definite and automatic triggers to the process of creating such change. But, fundamentally, the

provisions contained in the directive principles are sound (the Constitution already proclaims the

virtue of these principles) and they merit the full force of the law behind them. Obliging the

government to steer a specific course makes it answerable to the charge it is given. The absence

of accountability remains the single biggest obstacle to positive change in India, and in many

regards, the absence of legal provisions to back the directive principles is responsible.

Every child must go to school, this is not an option that the government may permit or merely

support, but an obligation it must fulfill. In every civilized corner of the world, for example,

children are guaranteed a secondary-level education; in India we are still debating the enactment

of the 83rd Amendment to bring this about, and in doing so admitting that we have neglected the

charge to bring this about 40+ years ago. If we could have sued your state government for not

fulfilling this obligation in the 1960s, a few million more Indians might be literate today, there

may well have been several million fewer of us, and the goal of economic opportunity to all

might be more real. Instead, without the threat of being held to account for failing to meet this

obligation, every successive government has paid lip service to this basic need, with shocks felt

everywhere in society.

And so it is with other aspects of our lives. Every working person must make a living wage.

Every citizen is entitled to equal justice under a uniform set of laws. Every person performing a

certain job is entitled to equal pay without discrimination. I didn't dream these up in a fit of

political scheming. Sixty four years ago, the framers of the Constitution found these notions to be

sufficiently dignified that they directed the state to function in pursuit of them, permitting only that

a finite and small period of time may be necessary to give them the force of law. That time has

long since passed, both by the measure they themselves instituted (ten years) and by the

yardstick of merely looking around us to witness the horror of our failure to reach the desired

ends.

Honest respect for the Constitution demands that its ideals be enshrined in the laws of the land.

Republic Day must be more than the might of our armed forces on display, and more than a

fleeting celebration of diversity in our culture. Let's make a common-sense fix to the

Constitution -- the document that marks this annual event -- which construes a real nation with

shared destinies in law, and is built with public policy that is universal. Let the Directive

Principles of State Policy be more than a set of ideals to which we profess homage. Instead, let

them have the force of law, and be enforceable in the courts.



In the life of a nation, sixty four years is a long enough time for introspection and reflection to take stock,what are our achievements and in which direction are we headed?

Money todayhas become the sole measure of success. We live in a dog-eat-dog world.

Where we are selfishly occupied with our own selves.

Do we care about our culture and nation anymore?

Aren’t we leaving behind apoor legacy?



THESE VERSES WRITTEN BY THE POET IQBAL ISSUED A TIMELY WARNING:



VATAN KI FIKAR KAR NADAN



MUSIBAT AANE WALI HAI



TERI BARBADIYON KE MASHWARE HAIN



AASMANO MEIN



NA SAMJHOGE TO MIT JAOGE,



AEI HINDUSTAN WALO,



TUMHARI DASTAN TAQ BHI



NA HOGI DASTANO MEIN.



Today, in INDIA

A concerned citizen feels helpless and lost,

He doesn’t know where to start

He wants to do something

But doesn’t know what

He needs direction and finds none

He is angry,

Yet scared.

The biggest delimma an honest citizen faces is that of survival with the current social values,he cannot become a part of the system,neither can he beat it,nor accept it .



Hope and trust is what empower us to take calculated risks which are so essential for the

development of a society . without a strong civil society, political and economic structures would

fail. Business cannot thrive when there is no trust between producers and consumers, employers

and employees. Families and communities fail because of a lack of support from one another.

Neighborhoods fail because of the lack of fellow –feeling. Civil societies rest on moral

relationships and mutual respect. Our people have been deprived of their basic constitutional and

fundamental rights. They feel helpless when faced with inadequate judicial recourse. Have the

common mans dreams turned into nightmares?



Is this india’s tryst with destiny that was proclaimed with much fanfare, sixty four years ago?



A state, where a citizen is scared of his own government officials,the police and the judiciary, is known as a TERRORIST STATE

Such state turn their citizens into subjects and torment them

Is this not breach of trust



But the bigger question for all of us for last 64 yrs



WHO WILL BELL THE CAT ?



If we wish to be free, we must fight

Shall we gather strenght by irresolution and inaction?

Is life so dear

Or peace so sweet

As to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?

Forbid it almighty GOD!

I know not what course others may take ,but as as for as me,

Either give liberty to enjoy my constitutional rights or throw me away out of the country.

As a matter of fact this fraudulant social values / system / corruption has ruined me & entire nation

As we never opposed to this legacy.



Almost 80-90% of the wealth of the nation is in the control of say 5-10% of the population. The majority of the population hardly has access to any wealth and live in abject poverty.

One of the biggest factors is 'Corruption.' It is the cancer eating into the vitals of the society. It has permeated into all facets of life, affecting the poor and voiceless. Today, the common man with no money or muscle power, cannot think of getting any thing done in the developing world, without having to pay bribe.



Global institutions such as World Bank, IMF, and UN must enjoy legitimacy from their member countries and the international community.

They must be responsive, with the interests of all members, especially the smaller and poorer, being taken into account. The governance of these institutions must be flexible, must respond to new challenges, national priorities and specific circumstances.

A scathing report from the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of IMF highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in IMF. The IEO measured governance along four dimensions – effectiveness, efficiency, accountability and voice – and against three standards – the

Fund's own governing documents, other international organisations, and private & public-sector corporations. The report finds accountability and voice are the weakest features of the Fund's governance and these weaknesses entail risks to the Fund's legitimacy, which in turn has a bearing on its effectiveness.



If this is the situation with global institutions, we can well imagine what would be the situation with national and regional institutions.

No wonder they abound in corruption of all sorts and get away with it. Then, how do we get over this corruption mania? One sure way would be

to plug all the leakages in the system. This cannot be done without active support of the governments and its citizens.

An initiative started by eminent personalties , headed by old veteran leader Anna Hazare may become instrumental if we common people of india support them to fight back with corruption.

Always renmember

Every generation has to choose & protect his freedom , no GANDHI/BHAGAT SINGH will come back on planet earth to protect you from your own government

Its upto you to stand & fight back.



This is a once-in-a-millenium opportunity for humanity -- 2011 is so powerfully lucky, that if you have the right tools, you can ride its luck straight into the months to come!

Why is the number 11 considered such a powerful force? You probably know that it's been considered a special number for centuries in cultures much too divergent to be a mere coincidence. In fact this number appears throughout history as a magical source of power.

The spiritual meaning of the number 11 brings us to the very height of vibrational frequencies...it is considered a Master number and possesses the qualities of intuition, patience, honesty, sensitivity, and spirituality, and is also idealistic. It is the number of the Light within us all. It represents new beginnings.

Recently on 2 nd April 2011 , we all have seen how a big country like INDIA can be united for single reason may be world cup 20011. We did it humanity has seen it.

Now its turn to unite for one another cause , which is related with the life of each & every citizen of this country.

Lets join hand together on 5th april to showcase our unity to the government



Er.LASTMAN OF INDIA

City-coordinator
india against corruption

FARRUKHABAD U.P

MO: 9453538312

lastmanofindia@gmail.com

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Friday, March 25, 2011

A Love Letter to Japan Movie

A Love Letter to Japan Movie: "35,000 people around the globe were asked one question: What would you write in a letter to the people of Japan? This is our answer. http://www.lovelettertojapan.com"

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Free internet classifieds service. Over 200,000 indexed sellers with high quality pictures

Laptop with 10 100Base-TX Network Access and MC HMC 802.11B

$400.00 US

Laptop with 10 100Base-TX Network Access and MC HMC 802.11B

buy and sell > computers

Key Specifications Special Features · Screen 10.1-inch · Resolution 1,024 x 576 pixels · CPU Intel N450 1.66GHz processor · HDD 160 250 320GB SATA · Memory DDRII SO-DIMM, 1 to 2GB · Network access 10 100Base-TX · WLAN options MC HMC, 802.11B G N · Optional for built-in Bluetooth function · 2hrs long playing time · Built-in 1.3-megapixel web camera · I O ports · Microphone-in x 1 piece · Headphone x 1 piece · CRT VGA x 1 piece · Lan connector x 1 piece · USB port (2.0) x 2 pieces · SD card slot x 1 piece · DC slot x 1 piece · Input device standard English 83-key built-in touch pad, set two shortcut key · Operating systems Linux, Microsoft s Windows XP Home Edition SP3 English (optional) · Unit weight 1.25kg · Unit size 25.5 x 18 x 3.3cm